<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Customers on Undeleted Files</title><link>https://undeleted.ronsor.com/tags/customers/</link><description>Recent content in Customers on Undeleted Files</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 08:00:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://undeleted.ronsor.com/tags/customers/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI Is (Not) a Service Problem</title><link>https://undeleted.ronsor.com/ai-service-problem/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 08:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://undeleted.ronsor.com/ai-service-problem/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Generative AI has remained a sore topic in online art communities, leading to the development
of adversarial solutions like &lt;a href="https://glaze.cs.uchicago.edu/"&gt;Glaze&lt;/a&gt; which aim to make images
untrainable or have undesirable effects on models. Unfortunately, these solutions are not without
their downsides—downsides which are visible to human viewers as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I recently observed a conversation on an artist Discord server. One artist asked for advice on
whether he should &amp;ldquo;glaze&amp;rdquo; the commissioned work he had done for a client before sending it. The
unanimous response from the other artists was to just send the glazed work. One even (falsely)
said it only affects AI.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>